4.
explanations have been accepted". I have only once seen Mr. Seth in connexion with this matter, and that was about a year ago, when the question of the Registry was first initiated.
Your Honour requests that the first five paragraphs of your letter under reply shall be communicated to Mr. Seth. In these paragraphs you find fault with my own action, you censure Mr. Seth and you finally accuse him of falsehood as a "side issue" - all with reference to a matter which at the present moment is at Your Honour's own request under the consideration of the Secretary of State. It is not in my view fitting that the Governor should be made the intermediary of such a communication in such circumstances. In those matters in respect of which the Registrar of the Supreme Court is subordinate to the Chief Justice it is within Your Honour's discretion to express to him whatever views you desire, and as regards matters outside the supervision of the Chief Justice it is for me if necessity arises to express censure.
5.
I must add that I cannot subscribe to your view that because you "as Chief Justice of this Colony" have made a statement to me another officer of unblemished character has made a contrary statement, there can be no question of difference of memory, or of misunderstanding, and I must accept it as beyond doubt that the latter officer is guilty of deliberate
$8
,IX
.Y I O
33
avok neĽUT18VOD
‚2095 „dorak .ɗtes (gnoxynoH
Tasar
TAJJAL TUOy agbelwondos of wonor art evaŃ I
at ronok woy tart batt or doim vzev terger I
.978b Bhit to
y al benlacnoo awmiy va to nuttensiqxa odd did?w belteltanelb
asid of "ylarizna rumah" now tærit has .Nedl forst to retai
al moitos to eetuos aid .andet avad I fortw noitos to sarvoo
Axet of fabuster a" at galtalanos na ono o vd bedtroceb
{A+62 .1[} 1eal?to add dæit ovatíed tonnso I sensosd egate vIIS
**Atırt edt nuixaeqe con al
hlvora sonabnoqɛarton erit tart bertasb mo
.S
Sono JA Esw alde bra #3637 to VTAJerosë ars of bastimenant ed
erit ¿geons of benifash twoпof to¥ viger atd to tqtoo97 00
.enob
aad angebuOqBHTY00 Wan s bus,nolaloeb alatsin to visade 70 OP
bajðinanand svar I. (decupar a'zoпoli tuoy da alega) dołów neaizs
anw #1 dołdw geta vino sit aaw alm .adat? to visteros2 art of
aid of Tadjem Bild gairratar yd bus ‚exað oð em rot asqo ttsi
.abner to duo nexst need asd Innoqalb ati state to visdemo82
naɔ woy as ist 08" tent atreras Mono” wor
.ε
analqxe egodw diet .*M dołw awolyrotni Istoved bad evad I toitsa
anott-
explanations have been accepted". I have only once seen Mr.
4.
Seth in connexion with this matter, and that was about a year
ago, when the question of the Registry was first initiated.
Your Honour requests that the first five
paragraphs of your letter under reply shall be cormmunicated to Mr. Seth. In these paragraphs you find fault with my own action,
you censure Mr. Seth and you finally accuse him of falsehood as
a "side issue" - all with reference to a matter which at the
present moment is at Your Honour's own request under the con-
-sideration of the Secretary of State. It is not in my view
fitting that the Governor should be made the intermediary of
such a communication in such circumstances. In those matters
in respect of which the Registrar of the Supreme Court is
subordinate to the Chief Justice it is within Your Honour's
discretion to express to him whatever views you desire, and as
regards matters outside the supervision of the Chief Justice it
is for me if necessity arises to express censure.
5.
I must add that I cannot subscribe to your
view that because you "as Chief Justice of this Colony" have
made a statement to me another officer of unblemished character
ejano
has made a contrary statement, there can be no question of
difference of memory, or of misunderstanding, and I must accept
it as beyond doubt that the latter officer is guilty of
deliberate
T
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.